[7] In tissue sections, entomophthoromycotina are easily differentiated from other fungi by their characteristic hyphal morphology. The hyphae are broad, ribbon-like, aseptate or sparsely septate, with right- or wide-angle branching.[47] The histological inflammatory reaction shows
predominance of lymphocytes, Selleck SRT1720 plasma cells, epitheloid cells, multinucleate giant cells and histiocytes.[1] In addition, entomophthoromycosis is characterised by an important histological finding in the form of eosinophilic hyaline material around hyphae in haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections (Splendore–Hoeppli phenomenon).[2, 44] The characteristic histological and histochemical feature of basidiobolomycosis are illustrated in Fig. 2.[25] However, Splendore–Hoeppli phenomenon is not pathognomonic of entomophthoromycosis, as it is also seen in other infections e.g. sporotrichosis and schistosomiasis.[37] Typically, there is no evidence of angioinvasion, necrosis or tissue infarction.[21] Diagnosis of the disease remains difficult and may initially be missed. The fungus may be rare in tissue sections and when present is often fragmented.[2] Additionally, focal hyphae may appear
in only part of the specimen.[1] Moreover, fungal elements stain poorly with H&E and are not well demonstrated with fungus-specific tissue stains as periodic acid Schiff.[2] Examination of the fluorescent dye (Blankophor) wet-mount preparation under fluorescent microscopy increases the sensitivity of diagnosis.[18] Isolating the fungus by culture and molecular confirmation have epidemiological significance and also help in definitive diagnosis MLN2238 nmr and determining the susceptibility to antifungal agents.[18] Cultures should be inoculated
soon after tissue procurement, since the organisms do not survive at 4°C.[39] Entomophthoromycotina produce characteristic colonies on standard mycologic media e.g. SDA, potato dextrose agar or corn meal agar.[48] The colonies are dense, waxy, deeply furrowed and folded with a rapid growth at 37°C. The propulsion of conidia is characteristic of the genus. Conidia are forcibly ejected and stick to the Petri dish lid, thus clouding the view into culture with time.[2, 46] Although culture remains the ‘gold standard’ for disease diagnosis and species identification[2]; yet, recovery of fungi in the culture could Grape seed extract also be problematic. Countless results of negative cultures have been reported throughout the literature.[2, 49] This may be due to the aggressive processing of the specimen that occurs before plating, where fungal hyphae are often damaged and become non-viable.[2] Because of these difficulties in culture techniques and because successful management relies on early diagnosis; it has been agreed that microscopic identification of characteristic fungi should be considered significant even if the offending fungus couldn’t be recovered in culture.