The mean daily dose of quetiapine XR received

during hosp

The mean daily dose of selleck chemical quetiapine XR received

during hospitalization was significantly higher than that of quetiapine IR (494 mg/day versus 345 mg/day respectively; p = 0.001) (Figure 1). Furthermore, the mean dose of quetiapine XR used in patients as ongoing treatment at discharge was significantly higher than that of quetiapine IR (494 and 335 mg/day respectively; p = 0.002). Figure 1. The mean daily dose (mg/days) of quetiapine extended release (XR) and quetiapine immediate release (IR) versus time in hospital (days). Concomitant medication The mean number of concomitant medications was 3.11 in the quetiapine XR group Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and 4.24 in the quetiapine IR group (27% difference, p = 0.04). Almost all patients (98%) were treated with one or more concomitant psychiatric medications during hospitalization. Of these patients, 85% in the IR group and 81% in the XR group were treated with other antipsychotics (nonsignificant). Patients DAPT secretase Notch receiving quetiapine IR were to a higher degree treated with other antipsychotics both short Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and long term than those on quetiapine XR (Table 3). Most concomitant antipsychotic and antidepressant medications were long term, while drugs for mood stabilization, anxiety or sleep disorders Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical were short term. There was no significant difference in the number of concomitant medications at discharge (2.28 versus 2.53 for

the quetiapine XR and IR groups respectively). Table 3. Percentage of patients with other treatments per month of hospital stay, short term (≤ 7 days) and long term (> 7 days) term. Patient assessment No significant differences were seen with regard to GAF total score, hospitalisations, or ECT treatments. The mean Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical GAF

total score at admission for patients receiving quetiapine XR was 30.6 compared with 32.8 for those on quetiapine IR (p = 0.22); the mean GAF total score at discharge was LSM 44.8 versus 46.3 (p = 0.44); and changes in GAF total score during hospitalization were LSM 14.9 versus 15.7; p = 0.70 between the quetiapine XR and IR groups. Patients on quetiapine XR had a numerically longer duration of hospitalization than those in the quetiapine IR group (45.8 Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical versus 33.2 days respectively; p = 0.08). ECT treatment was seen in eight patients in the quetiapine XR group versus one patient in the IR group (p = 0.11). Patient comorbidities and reasons for treatment Patient comorbidities and reasons for treatment were recorded for psychiatric conditions other than schizophrenia, Cilengitide as well as for somatic reasons. There were a number of reasons for treating other disorders, including insomnia, psychosis, anxiety, and schizophrenia per se. A total of 38% of patients on quetiapine IR and 36% of those treated with quetiapine XR had comorbidities (nonsignificant, p = 0.84). Schizophrenia was significantly more commonly reported as a reason for treatment in patients on quetiapine XR than in those on quetiapine IR (20% versus 0% respectively; p = 0.0003).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>