These kinds of data will help us better understand who will most benefit from behavioral or pharmacological interventions to reduce adrenergic signaling or stress response states – for example, what levels of stress/distress are necessary at the outset for an intervention

to make a difference. Moreover, the use of discrete interventions is useful for mechanistic research purposes, but it is possible that multifaceted total lifestyle interventions that address stress factors, as well as nutritional and exercise lifestyle components, will be necessary to profoundly impact cancer growth. To date, research on multimodal http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ldk378.html interventions remains quite limited. Additionally, the effects of biobehavioral pathways on recovery Selleckchem Lapatinib from specific cancer treatments such as HSCT, adoptive immunotherapy, surgical recovery, are important frontiers for future work. Understanding tumor and treatment effects on the central nervous system are equally important.

As reported by some of the papers in this volume, we are just beginning to understand the relevant biology in post-chemotherapy fatigue and cognitive difficulties – this type of mechanistic understanding is critical before new treatments can be developed and tested. Future directions also include determination of what

are the most important intermediate outcome variables for biobehavioral cancer research. In addition to overall survival and progression-free survival, to what extent are gene signatures, metabolomics, and epigenetic changes important outcomes for this work? The research in this volume points to the dramatic discoveries that have been made in the last decade to define this field. Future research holds promise for discovery of novel biobehavioral signaling pathways that are relevant to cancer and a greater understanding of behavioral, pharmacologic, Galeterone and complementary interventions that target these mechanisms. In conclusion, we would be remiss if we did not thank lead authors and their authorship teams for contributing scientific advances relevant to this volume. These individuals and many others have worked quite tirelessly to improve methodological rigor, establish causation as appropriate, collaborate in the spirit of transdisciplinary team science, and move between different research designs to test and confirm experimental and clinical findings. We thank the many scholars who engaged in the peer review process to vet the invited mini-reviews and empirical papers that comprise this supplement.