The highest affinity was predicted for NET (charged: −830 kcal/mo

The highest affinity was predicted for NET (charged: −830 kcal/mol; neutral: −820 kcal/mol), followed by DAT (charged: −798 kcal/mol neutral: −792 kcal/mol) and SERT (charged: −697 kcal/mol neutral: −683 kcal/mol); nevertheless, scores alone have limited predictive power ( Warren et al., 2006) and require confirmation by other means. This limitation, however, is less relevant in our approach, because the same ligand is docked into almost identical binding sites. The observed phenylalanine – tyrosine substitution between NET and DAT is very conservative, but it introduces a polar hydroxyl function ABT 888 by contrast with the

hydrophobic phenylalanine side-chain. Importantly, the phenyl ring of levamisole directly contacts residue F151 in NET or residue Y155 in DAT in our docking poses, which is consistent with the experimental data. Our inhibition experiments showed that binding affinities of levamisole for SERT were lower when compared to that for NET and DAT. The binding

site differs by five residues between DAT and SERT (residues Y95, G100, I172, Y175 and T497 in SERT) and by four residues between NET and SERT (residue Y95, G100, I172 and T497 in SERT). Levamisole was found to be in direct contact with four of these www.selleckchem.com/products/cobimetinib-gdc-0973-rg7420.html residues. We only observed that residue T497 was not in direct contact with the inhibitor. In line with our experimental findings, the difference in affinity between SERT and NET or DAT was therefore recapitulated by our computational approach. The active metabolite of levamisole (aminorex) binds with comparable affinity to DAT and NET, while the affinity to SERT is lower (see Fig. 5). Aminorex is smaller than levamisole. During our docking studies of aminorex, we applied the same protocol as used for levamisole and identified

docking poses in the central binding site S1. Both, neutral and positively charged forms of aminorex have been docked, as the pKa of this psychostimulant is 7.4. We observed similar poses for both protonation states and discuss here the results of the positively charged state, Cediranib (AZD2171) as endogenous substrates are typically Modulators transported in their charged form. The positively charged nitrogen of aminorex interacts in a similar way with the aspartate (D75 in NET, D79 in DAT, D98 in SERT) as found for levamisole or nortriptyline in the recently published dDAT structure ( Penmatsa et al., 2013). The rank order of the binding energies scores (IFD score) compares favorably with the experimentally found affinities: NET (−822 kcal/mol), DAT (−789 kcal/mol) and SERT (−693 kcal/mol). Docking poses revealed overlapping geometries for the interaction of aminorex with NET and DAT (see Fig. 7B). Aminorex is in direct contact with Y151 in NET or F155 in DAT which could help to explain the observed differences in affinity. Importantly, the docking pose in SERT is different.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>