Researchers should also be cognizant that the study implementation methods (i.e. the use/non-use of a diary Pictilisib research buy card, frequency of home follow-up, passive vs. active reporting, provision of thermometers),

and local perceptions of symptoms will have an impact on severity scores, and potentially, vaccine efficacy estimates. In order to better understand the scoring systems and how they categorize severe disease, as well as to prepare for additional rotavirus vaccine trials, future rotavirus clinical severity scoring system research should focus on understanding the ideal mild, moderate, and severe cut points for these scoring systems, identifying the scoring system items contained within the VSS and CSS that are most indicative of severe disease, and identifying an ideal single severity scoring system for use in developing country populations less than 2 years of age in Africa and Asia. The efficacy trials were conducted with funding from PATH’s Rotavirus Vaccine Program under a grant from the a GAVI Alliance, and Merck Research Laboratories. Thank you ABT-199 in vitro to the study participants, mothers, and families who participated in the research that made this analysis possible and to each site Principal Investigator (Dr. D. Anh, Dr. G. Armah, Dr. R. Breiman, Dr. S. Sow, and Dr. K. Zaman) and his team for

the diligence and care in implementing and collecting severity score information from the PDK4 efficacy trials. Finally, thank you to Erin Kester, Joyce Erickson, and Megan Le from PATH who were

instrumental in coordinating the journal supplement. Contributors: KDCL was involved in reviewing all relevant literature, developing the study methods specific to this comparative analysis of the two scoring systems, conducting data analysis and preparing the first and subsequent drafts of the manuscript. KMN, MJ, and AF were involved in developing the study methods specific to this comparative analysis of the two scoring systems, reviewing the data, and preparing the first draft of the manuscript. MJD, JCV, MC, TCM, GA, and KZ were involved in acquisition of the data, and critical review of the data analysis and manuscript. Conflict of interest statement: MJD and TCM are employees of Merck Research Laboratories, which manufactures RotaTeq, and MC was an employee of Merck Research Laboratories when the clinical trial was conducted, and all own/owned equity interest in the company. Disclosure: All authors have approved the final article. “
“Group A rotavirus causes over half a million deaths in infants and young children worldwide [1]. The recognition of the worldwide disease burden and the potential for prevention of morbidity and mortality through vaccines led to the establishment of a number of national and regional rotavirus surveillance networks [2]. Since 2002, data on rotavirus surveillance has been generated from at least 196 sites in 59 countries [3].