No significant interaction effect was found for life stress click here responses across days or conditions (P > 0.05). For part B, whilst a significant interaction effect was demonstrated across days (F = 4.708; P = 0.021), post hoc analysis only revealed a trend for lower overall responses on day 3 compared to day 1 (P = 0.08). Table 5 Assessment of test beverage

influence on post trial DALDA questionnaire and subjective muscle soreness     PL     CPE     P1 P2 P3 P1 P2 P3 DALDA Part A 1.46 ± 0.39 1.08 ± 0.33 0.85 ± 0.27 1.00 ± 0.30 1.15 ± 0.30 1.08 ± 0.24 DALDA Part B 3.08 ± 0.76 3.15 ± 0.94 1.92 ± 0.74 3.23 ± 0.65 2.15 ± 0.59 1.77 ± 0.30 MQS 2.21 ± 0.35 1.65 ± 0.20 1.49 ± 0.16 1.68 ± 0.21 1.36 ± 0.14 1.28 ± 0.15* MVLS 2.27 ± 0.38 1.62 ± 0.21 1.50 ± 0.16 1.65 ± 0.22 1.35 ± 0.15 1.19 ± 0.13* # MDVLS 2.31 ± 0.35 1.54 ± 0.18 1.46 ± 0.14 1.69 ± 0.26 1.31 ± 0.17 1.15 ± 0.10* # MHS 2.15 ± 0.33 1.69 ± 0.21 1.35 ± 0.13 1.73 ± 0.31 1.58 ± 0.30 1.42 ± 0.21 AICAR mouse Values are presented as mean ± SE; n = 16; PL, Placebo; CPE, carbohydrate-protein-electrolyte; P1-3, post trial days 1 to 3; MQS, mean quadriceps soreness; MVLS, mean vastus lateralis soreness; MDVLS, mean distal vastus lateralis soreness; MHS, mean hamstring soreness.* denotes a significant reduction between P1 and P3 overall (P < 0.05). # denotes a significant reduction between

P1 and P2 overall (P < 0.05). No significant BAY 80-6946 cost differences were found for any of the pre trial muscle soreness assessments (P > 0.05). Post trial muscle soreness assessment data are represented in Table 5. Mean quadriceps soreness was significantly different post trial (F = 7.824; P = 0.013), with soreness ratios only different between days 1 and 3 (P = 0.05). Data was not different between conditions (P > 0.05). Likewise, mean vastus lateralis (VL), and mean distal VL soreness assessment was significantly different between days 1 and 2, and

1 and 3 post trial only (P < 0.05). No other differences were observed for soreness data. Discussion Submaximal exercise One of the key findings from this study was that the ingestion of a CPE beverage maintained total distance, average speed and power output in ST2 when compared to PL. At a prescribed exercise intensity, total Megestrol Acetate distance covered significantly decreased by 9.12% from 20.18 ± 0.28 km in ST1 to 18.34 ± 0.36 km in ST2 when participants consumed a fruit concentrate PL. In contrast, there was no significant difference between ST1 and ST2 for total distance covered when participants consumed a CPE beverage. Whilst there were no differences found between conditions for ST1 or ST2, the significant reduction in work output for the PL group does support previous research indicating that CHO ingestion is likely to be more beneficial for longer duration [15, 16] or subsequent high intensity exercise bouts [17].