In addition to that, a lower limit of measurable adhesion forces exists for the SCFS, which is due to both the limited force resolution of the system and the squeezing of the cells during the measurements that can possibly induce adhesion force artefacts (see below). Both limits could be illustrated by measuring the small adhesion forces between single RBCs under physiological conditions (Fig. 4). The only way to explain the difference in both techniques is the slightly invasive nature of the SCFS. An this website inevitable part of the SCFS measurements is the requirement for a preset force set point that is used as a marker if both cells have come into close contact (i.e.,

squeezing the two cells together with a certain set point force). This invasive squeezing of the cells is artificial, and it most likely induces a small adhesion by itself. The above mentioned problems should not arise when probing RBCs for specific molecules, e.g., for testing receptor binding.97 In this case, the cantilever is functionalised with the specific molecules (e.g., fibrinogen), the binding between receptor and agonist is specific and thus allows measuring the adhesion between a molecule-coated cantilever and the RBC. When measuring forces between RBCs, it would be desirable to combine the complementary methods BIBF 1120 ic50 of SCFS and HOT. Unfortunately, both methods are complex and laborious, and this advice might

not always be feasible. Therefore, the tool can be chosen according to the dimension of the expected force. The SCFS is advised for adhesion forces larger than 30 pN and the HOT for adhesion forces smaller than 30 pN. While the squeezing of the cells in the SCFS measurements is the tuclazepam critical parameter, the laser power is the critical parameter in the HOT measurements. We are left with the impression that a significant portion of the past literature on RBCs should be re-read to verify whether it could have been affected by the problem

of cell contamination. Of course, one will not incur such problems when studying RBCs at a single-cell level. Recent studies provided first indications that RBC populations are rather heterogeneous,10Fig. 3, which may result in additional problems when working with bulk suspensions as well as with single RBCs. A major reason for the inhomogeneities of circulating RBCs are differences in the cell age.98 There are indications that the plasma membrane Ca2 + pump activity decreases with RBC age in a monotonic fashion,99 which may lead, at least for some cells, to changes in the sodium and potassium content. However, when performing single-cell experiments, the cells are chosen randomly, i.e., cells can be from one or the other end of the age scale. Moreover, variable amounts of circulating reticulocytes also contribute to the variability of measurements performed on bulk RBC suspensions, even after WBCs and platelets have been carefully removed.