Alternatively, renal impairment U0126 chemical structure may establish metabolic conditions predisposing to the development of SA. Proteinuria is associated with SA and may improve with SA treatment. Transplantation was initially reported to improve or cure SA in ESRD but the post-transplant state

itself may not free individuals of the risk for SA. The post-transplant state is associated with physiologic and metabolic derangements accounting for the higher prevalence of SA compared with the general population. Sleep apnoea is associated with higher mortality and morbidity similar to CKD. The high prevalence of SA in kidney disease and its clinical implications warrants vigilance in diagnosing SA in this population. Specific management strategies may decrease risk or ameliorate SA. Treatment of SA has shown CH5424802 mw improvement in various organ systems, but treatment of SA in altering the course of CKD has yet to be determined. The authors thank Drs Victoria Kumar and Dean Kujubu from the Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center

for their critical comments on this manuscript. “
“The options for long-term maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis (LN) remain controversial. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the prognosis and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) used as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. The data of Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE were retrieved to search the studies about the RCT studies that compared MMF with AZA used as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. We extracted the data reflecting prognosis, which included mortality, end-stage renal failure (ESRF), renal relapse, doubling serum creatinine, and adverse effects, then further analyzed the combined results of

data and calculated the relative risk (RR). Four RCT studies including 328 patients were enrolled into our meta-analysis. There was no difference between the patients receiving either MMF or AZA for maintenance therapy in preventing relapse, progression to end-stage renal failure, death and doubling of serum creatinine. MMF is not superior to AZA in terms of the risks of infection and gastrointestinal upset, but fewer patients receiving MMF developed filipin leukopenia (RR 0.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04–0.39; P = 0.0004) and amenorrhoea (RR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04–0.72; P = 0.02) than those receiving AZA. The current limited evidence suggests that MMF offers similar prognosis as AZA for maintenance therapy, while MMF appears safer than AZA in the treatment of lupus nephritis. “
“To assess the first year outcomes in terms of patient survival rate, graft survival rate and secondary outcomes after starting the first live related renal transplant in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Nepal.