A large number of TA studies have been carried out examining isolated pigment-protein complexes (e.g., El-Samad et al. 2006; Müller et al. 2010; Ruban et al. 2007) as well as synthetic constructs that mimic qE in artificial systems (e.g., Berera et al. 2006; Terazono et al. 2011); a full discussion of these studies is outside the scope of this paper. Because the site of qE may not be localized on a single protein, and because the quenching properties of proteins may be altered when they are isolated from the membrane environment, correlating the results of TA experiments with qE quenching in isolated proteins is difficult. As a result,

it has been necessary to study intact systems that are capable of performing qE. Thylakoid membranes are the smallest isolatable units that are capable of activating qE with light and provide a system Selleck XMU-MP-1 that can be studied in solution, unlike solid-state samples such as leaves. Experiments on thylakoid membranes (Holt C646 et al. 2005; Ma et al. 2003) have suggested that carotenoids are directly involved in the qE mechanism. Recently, a method for measuring TA during light adaptation in intact leaves was developed by the Holzwarth group (2013), which holds great promise for examining the photophysical mechanism of qE in intact photosynthetic systems. The results of TA spectroscopy,

sometimes accompanied by theoretical calculations, have led to the proposal of several different hypotheses for the photophysical mechanism of the deactivation of excited singlet chlorophyll via qE quenching: (1) the aggregation of LHCII leading to quenching by energy transfer to the lutein S1 state (Pascal et al. 2005; Ruban et al. 2007); (2) excitonic coupling between zeaxanthin and chlorophyll,

leading to dissipation of energy via the zeaxanthin S1 state (Bode et Adenosine triphosphate al. 2009), which has also been recently observed in https://www.selleckchem.com/Caspase.html reconstituted proteoliposomes containing PsbS and LHCII (Wilk et al. 2013); (3) aggregation of the LHCII trimers leading to chlorophyll–chlorophyll charge-transfer state that facilities quenching (Müller et al. 2010), which has also been correlated with a red-shifted emission of chlorophyll fluorescence (Holzwarth et al. 2009); and (4) the formation of a chlorophyll–zeaxanthin charge-transfer state that quenches chlorophyll fluorescence (Ahn et al. 2008; Holt et al. 2005). These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, but confirming or eliminating any one of them is challenging. These challenges arise from the large number of chromophores in the membrane and the lack of spectral separation between different species. For instance, chlorophyll radical cations and anions do not have distinct, sharp spectral peaks (Fujita et al. 1978), making it difficult to unambiguously prove or disprove the formation of chlorophyll radical species during qE. Carotenoid cations do have distinct spectral peaks in the wavelength range of 900–1,000 nm (Galinato et al.