The mixture was filtered using 0.22 μm milipore filter with vacuum assistance and sonicated by ultrasonic bath for 15–20 min. A stock solution was prepared by dissolving accurately weighed 100 mg of clebopride in 100 mL of methanol to yield a final concentration of 1 mg/mL, sonicated for 5 min, allowed to equilibrate to room temperature. The stock solution (1000 μg/mL of clebopride) was diluted suitably and spiked with human blank plasma to get 1–60 ng/mL of drug. 200 μL of each calibration standards were pipetted HDAC inhibitor into a series of Ria vial tube and vortexed briefly. 3 mL of mixture of diethyl ether: dichloromethane (50:50 (v/v)) was added to each

Ria vial and caped. All calibration samples were vortexed for approximately for 3 min and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for approximately 5 min at 10 °C. The organic layer (2.0 mL) was quantitatively transferred to a 4 mL glass tube and evaporated to dryness at 40 °C under a stream of nitrogen. Then, the dried extract was reconstituted Selleck Lenvatinib in 200 μL of mobile phase and a 20 μL aliquot was injected into the chromatographic system using Hamilton syringe. The drug was estimated at 283 nm using UV detector to maximize the signal of compound and minimize the

signal of plasma interferents. The ratio of mobile phases was optimized by several trials to get good resolution and symmetric peak shape for the clebopride. The developed HPLC method was optimized by monitoring chromatographic parameters including retention time, column efficiency (HETP) of the various variations of composition, and flow rate of mobile phase. Efficiency values (N) showed the results of ≥4400, this suggested that the sharp peak produced enough. The system Tryptophan synthase suitability parameters are given in Table 1. The developed method was evaluated for linearity, selectivity, accuracy and precision, stability during various stress conditions including bench top stability, freeze thaw stability, stability of stock solutions and dilution integrity and recovery. Blank plasma was tested for endogenous interference. Selectivity was evaluated by extracting different blank plasma samples. The

absence of interfering peaks at the same retention time of clebopride was considered as evidence for selectivity of the method. The typical chromatograms for the blank plasma and sample are given in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 respectively. Calibration curve was plotted by taking concentration of analyte in X axis and detector response in Y axis. The developed method was linear in the concentration range of 1–60 ng/mL with the correlation coefficient value of 0.998. Slope and intercept of the linearity curve ( Fig. 4) was found to be 20.23 and 0.919 respectively. Recovery of clebopride was evaluated by comparing the detector response of clebopride in three quality control samples (LQC, MQC and HQC) with the response of same in equivalent methanolic solutions (Table 2).