36 vs 0 49 mm2; F[1,8] = 72 25, p < 0 0001) However, quite unex

36 vs. 0.49 mm2; F[1,8] = 72.25, p < 0.0001). However, quite unexpectedly, the Stf- phage made a smaller plaque when plated on the ΔOmpC host, as opposed to the wt host (0.75 vs. 1.26 mm2; F[1,8] = 14.98, p = 0.005). For expectation (ii), we observed that, when plated on the wt host, the Stf+ phage made a smaller plaque when compared to the Stf- BX-795 phage (0.36 vs. 1.26 mm2; F[1,8] = 232.07, p < 0.0001). However, when plated on the ΔOmpC host, we only observed a borderline significant level of plaque size difference between the Stf+ and Stf- phages (0.49 vs. 0.75 mm2; F[1,8] = 4.45, p = 0.068; however, the non-parametric Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis

test showed a significant difference, z = -2.01, p = 0.034 for the one-way test). For expectation (iii), we observed that the plaque size difference between the Stf+ and Stf- phages is significantly larger when plated on the wt host (3.5-fold, with 95% confidence Selleck LY2835219 interval of 3.15 – 3.92-fold vs. 1.5-fold, with 95% confidence interval of 0.95 – 2.10-fold), indicating www.selleckchem.com/products/cilengitide-emd-121974-nsc-707544.html that a larger virion, as a result of having extra appendages, would retard virion diffusion through the top agar layer, thus reducing the plaque size. Figure

3 Effecs of host type and Stf on plaque size. Plaque sizes were determined for the Stf+ (filled circles) and Stf- (open circles) by plating on either the witld type (wt) or the ΔompC (ΔOmpC) E. coli cells. Error bars showed the 95% confidence intervals. Horizontal solid lines intend to show the size differences from the same phages when plated on different host. Testing model predictions

on phage plaque size and productivity Abedon and Culler [16, 22] reviewed seven mathematical models on phage plaque enlargement, as listed in the Appendix. Unfortunately, these models cannot be tested directly with our current data. This is because all the models required the parameter of virion diffusivity, a quantity we did not measure in this study. However, by taking advantage of our identical experimental condition and various isogenic phage strains that only differed Dichloromethane dehalogenase in selected traits, we can nevertheless test the relative impacts of various phage traits on plaque formation and progeny production in the plaques. We reasoned that the plaque radius r or plaque productivity p can be expressed as functions of phage traits so that r = f(a, L, D) and p = g(a, L, D), where a is the adsorption rate, L the lysis time, and D the phage diffusivity. For isogenic phage strains that only differ in adsorption rates, the expected ratios of r 1 /r 2 and p 1 /p 2 can be simplified as r 1 /r 2 = f(a 1 , L, D)/f(a 2 , L, D) = f(a 1 )/f(a 2 ) and p 1 /p 2 = g(a 1 , L, D)/g(a 2 , L, D) = g(a 1 )/g(a 2 ).

Comments are closed.