26, P < 0.001; statistical significance not shown on graph). Post hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni adjustment for comparisons to Day 1 indicate that after 9 days, are all significantly faster than Day 1 (family-wise P < 0.02 after Bonferroni adjustments, individual P all ≤0.00115). The time to complete the task decreased from an average of 13 min to approximately 3 min overall (standard deviation among crayfish Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 4.55, estimated from the repeated measures ANOVA). Figure 3 Graphical representation of species and environmental factor comparison in a motor task. Graphs show both sighted and blind crayfish in white and red light. Sighted

(white light, N = 16; red light, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical N = 8) and blind crayfish (white light, N = 16; red light, … In contrast, blind crayfish in white light showed no such observed trend on a daily basis (only 1 day had a t-statistic less than [−2], which is not significant after accounting for the multiple comparisons). However, there was an overall learning difference between the first and last days of the experiment (df Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical = 30, t = 3.78, P < 0.001; Fig. 3). Thus, blind crayfish in white light did not show a significant daily trend in increasing task efficiency due to the variation across days, but did show an overall decreased time to complete the task by the end

of the experiment, to the point of not being significantly different from the other groups (Fig. 3). Further detailed analysis examining only the environmental interference factor of white (visible) light versus red (invisible) light in the learning capability between the two species showed similar overall learning trends. Specifically, a statistical Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical comparison of both sighted crayfish Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical conditions (white and red light) to that of blind crayfish conditions (white and red light) showed

no significant differences in overall learning between the two groups. The environmental factor of white light versus red light was investigated by fitting a repeated measures ANOVA that also included fixed terms for Light and the interaction of Light with Day (significance in the interaction term would indicate differing rates of learning). Using a Selleck ABT 263 backward elimination method, neither Rolziracetam the interaction term nor the Light variable itself was significant for sighted and blind crayfish (F14,224 = 1.35, P = 0.18 for the interaction and F1,224 = 0.24, P = 0.62 for the main effect of Light). The performance index for blind crayfish in white light (Fig. 3) appears to oscillate, but there is no phased locked cycle that we could quantify. To understand the time difference between when the crayfish found the spatial access point and when they completed the motor task, further analysis of the performance index divided the total task time into orientation and manipulation index.