To determine the base-levels Selleck DAPT of AvBD transcripts in control

COEC, amplified products were subjected to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis followed by image capture using an AlphaImager™ 3400. The average intensity of each PCR product with correct size was measured and the ratio between AvBD and β-actin PCR products was calculated. Expression values were caculated using the comparative Ct method as described by Applied Biosystems (User Bulletin No. 2). The threshold cycle (Ct) represents the cycle number at which the amount of amplified target reaches a fixed threshold. For the convenience of calculation, the default upper limit PCR cycle number [45] was assigned to reactions that failed to detect a signal (no amplification). The Ct values of AvBDs were subtracted by the Ct value of β-actin (internal control) of the same

sample. The normalized Ct values of AvBD genes amplified from SE-infected COEC relative to that of the control COEC at each time point was calculated as the fold-change using the formula 2-ΔΔCt ± SD where SD is the standard deviation. Statistical analysis Differences in the number of intracellular bacteria and the levels of AvBD expression induced by wild type and mutant SE strains 3-deazaneplanocin A cell line were determined by performing a see more two-tail Student t test (P < 0.05). Acknowledgements Katie L. Ebers was supported by NIH summer research program (5T35RR007071). References 1. CDC Salmonella Surveillance: Annual Summary, 2005. (Edited by: Bishop R, Fields P, Braden CR). Atlanta, Georgia, US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC 2007, P1–94. 2. Helms M, Simonsen J, Mølbak K: Foodborne bacterial infection and hospitalization: a registry-based study. Clin Infect Dis 2006, 42:498–506.CrossRefPubMed 3.

Kessel AS, Gillespie IA, O’Brien SJ, Adak GK, Humphrey TJ, Ward LR: General outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease linked with poultry, England and Wales 1992–1999. Commun Dis Public Health 2001, 4:171–177.PubMed 4. Guard-Petter J: The chicken, the egg and Salmonella enteritidis. Environmental Microbiol 2001, 3:421–430.CrossRef 5. Bohez L, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Botteldoorn N, Haesebrouck F, Van Immerseel F: Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis colonization of the chicken caecum requires the HilA regulatory protein. Vet Microbiol 2006, 116:202–210.CrossRefPubMed 6. Bohez L, Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Dewulf Chorioepithelioma J, Haesebrouck F, Van Immerseel F: The Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2 regulator ssrA promotes reproductive tract but not intestinal colonization in chickens. Vet Microbiol 2008, 126:216–24.CrossRefPubMed 7. Jones MA, Hulme SD, Barrow PA, Wigley P: The Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 and Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion systems play a major role in pathogenesis of systemic disease and gastrointestinal tract colonization of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the chicken. Avian Pathol 2007, 36:199–203.CrossRefPubMed 8.