These 102 subjects were divided

into two groups, Group 1

These 102 subjects were divided

into two groups, Group 1 (with less than 200 hours of training in the clerkship = 71 students) and Group 2 (those with 200 or more hours of training in the clerkship = 31 student) and were analyzed against each other in each of the objectives mentioned above. When comparing the number of patients: Group 2 find more students took care of an average 363.8 initial evaluations, whilst Group 1 students took care of an average of 136.9, giving an absolute difference of 226.9 patients, corresponding to an increase AMG510 concentration of 167.5 % by Group 2. The comparison between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.001075). (Table 1) Table 1 Number of procedures versus number of hours of extra-curricular supervised activities. Number of Procedures < 200h > 200h p value History Takings in Initial Patient Care 136.905 363.800 0.001075 Non-cast immobilizations 19.360 63.577 0.005303793 Cast immobilizations 32.811 102.160 0.000295235 Simple sutures 33.980 96.200 0.000032826369841 Donatti sutures 5.283 12.214 0.019836 Trauma Resuscitation Room visits 2.804 21.036 0.000045965 Under the guidance and supervision of ED doctors, medical students have the ability to request imaging to those patients

requiring further Anlotinib investigation. Students are then requested to follow-up the results afterwards, with the attending physician. Evaluation of the student radiographs revealed that Group 1 students requested an average of 152.6 radiographs while Group 2 students requested an average of 335.500 radiographs, an absolute increase of 182.8 examinations which represents a 119.7% increase for Group 2. When comparing the numbers of radiographs requested with the numbers of

radiographs followed up with the attending/radiologist, Group 1 had an average of 44.8 radiographs followed Interleukin-2 receptor up and Group 2 had an average of 167.4 followed up/evaluated (giving a difference of 122.6 – an increase of 273.8%). (p = 0.000128 for Group 1)( p = 0.012034 for Group 2). (Figure 1) Figure 1 Number of Radiographs Requests vs number of Radiographs evaluation/follow-up. Rose: Group 1 requests. Light-Blue: Group 1 evaluations/follow-ups. Red: Group 2 requests. Dark-Blue: Group 2 evaluations/follow-ups. The results comparing the orthopedic immobilization procedures were divided into plastered and non-plastered. Regarding non-plaster immobilizations, it was observed that students in the Group 1 on average performed 19.3 procedures and Group 2 students performed on average 63.5 procedures (resulting in an increase of 44.2 immobilizations for Group 2, that represents a 229% increase – p value = 0.0053). In addition to this, for plaster immobilizations, Group 1 students on average performed 32.8 procedures compared to an average of 102.1 procedures by Group 2. This represents an increase of 69.3 procedures (211.2% more plaster immobilization) for Group 2 (p = 0, 00029).

Comments are closed.